Mr. Jackson’s experience in the production of natural gas and operation of natural gas properties provides insight into one of West Virginia’s primary industries as well as the Company’s strategic and operational decisions. In addition, Mr. Jackson’s involvement as a director or trustee of many of West Virginia’s prominent non-profit and education organizations such as the Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation, the West Virginia Board of Education, the Clay Center for the Arts and Sciences of West Virginia, West Virginia Wesleyan College, Vision Shared West Virginia and the Discover the Real West Virginia Foundation provide insight into the business and educational climate of the state. Mr. Jackson has served as a director the Company’s Premier Bank subsidiary (and its predecessor Boone County Bank) since its formation by the Company in 1998, providing direct oversight at the local level. Nominee
| Age
| Principal Occupation or Employment(1)
| Director of
Company
Continuously
Since
| | | | | Keith F. Molihan | 6770 | Retired Executive Director, Ironton/Lawrence County Area Community Action Organization | 9/14/99 | Mr. Molihan’s career in local community economic development provides insight on lending decisions as well as business management. As an extension of his economic development activities, Mr. Molihan helped to organize Ohio River Bank, which later became a subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Molihan residesheadquartered in the local community ofIronton, Ohio River Bank,where he resides, and continues to serveserved as the bank’s only Chairman of the Board. Ohio River Bank became a subsidiary of the Company in March 1998 and was merged into Citizens Deposit Bank & Trust in August 2012. Mr. Molihan alsonow serves as a director of another subsidiary, FarmersCitizens Deposit Bank & Trust, providing direct oversight at the local level. |
Nominee | Age | Principal Occupation or Employment(1) | Director of Company Continuously Since | | | | | Marshall T. Reynolds | 7376 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Champion Industries, Inc. Mr. Reynolds serves as the Company's Chairman of the Board. From 1985 to November 1993, Mr. Reynolds also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bank One West Virginia, N.A. (and its predecessor, Key Centurion Bancshares, Inc.). | 1/19/96 | Mr. Reynolds’Reynolds is an entrepreneur in many industries in addition to the financial services industry. He owns stock in many banks both regionally and nationally. His banking experience as well as his other industry experience provide unique insight in setting the Board’s agenda as well as lending decisions, business management and expansion strategies for the Company. Mr. Reynolds serves as a director of twoone of the Company’s subsidiaries, Citizens Deposit Bank, and Adams National Bank, and providesproviding direct oversight at the local level. Mr. Reynolds also served as a director of another of the Company’s subsidiaries, Adams National Bank, until that bank was merged into Premier Bank on April 8, 2011. | Neal W. Scaggs | 7477 | President, Baisden Brothers, Inc. | 9/8/98 | Mr. Scaggs is a retired entrepreneur in the retail auto parts industry. He has served and continues to serve on the Board of Directors of various publicly traded companies. His business acumen as well as his participation on the boards of other publicly traded companies provides insight on lending decisions and business management. Mr. Scaggs resides in the local community of one the Company’s subsidiaries, Boone County Bank, and servesserved as a director of that bank through March 2011, providing direct oversight at the local level. | Robert W. Walker | 6366 | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Prior to becoming the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Walker was President of Boone County Bank, Inc.(now Premier Bank, Inc.) from September 1998 to October 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Walker was a regional president at Bank One West Virginia N.A . | 10/17/01 | Mr. Walker has a 30+ year banking career in West Virginia. He is a past Chairman of the West Virginia Bankers Association. He also serves as a director at each of the Company’s subsidiary banks. His broad banking experience and leadership skills provide lending insight as well as management skills for the Company. | Thomas W. Wright | 5759 | Owner and Chairman, NexQuest, Inc. (management company) | 4/18/01 | Mr. Wright is a business entrepreneur in many industries including restaurant ownership and waste management. He has also served as a director of other publicly traded companies. His business acumen as well as his participation on the board’s of other publicly traded companies provides insight on staff management and business management. |
(1) | Except where otherwise indicated, this principal occupation or employment has continued during the past five years. |
The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the election of each of the Company's nominees for election as a director.
The Board of Directors does not contemplate that any of the nominees will be unable to accept election as a director for any reason. However, in the event that one or more of such nominees is unable or unwilling to serve, the persons named in the proxies or their substitutes shall have authority, according to their judgment, to vote or to refrain from voting for other individuals as directors. The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors considers nominations of candiatescandidates for election as directors. The Company's bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders to make nominations of candidates for election as directors (the "Shareholder Notice Procedure"). The Shareholder Notice Procedure provides that only persons who are nominated by, or at the direction of, the Board of Directors, or by a shareholder who has given timely written notice to the Secretary of the Company prior to the meeting at which directors are to be elected, will be eligible for election as directors of the Company. Under the Shareholder Notice Procedure, to be timely, notice of shareholder nominations to be made at an annual or special meeting must be received by the Company not less than 14 days nor more than 50 days prior to the scheduled date of the meeting (or, if less than 21 days notice of the date of the meeting is given, the 7th day following the day such notice was given). Under the Shareholder Notice Procedure, a shareholder's notice to the Company proposing to nominate a person for election as a director must contain certain information, including, without limitation, the identity and address of the nominating shareholder, the number of shares of Common Stock that are owned by such shareholder and the name and address of the proposed nominee. If the Chairman of the Board or other officer presiding at a meeting determines that a person was not nominated in accordance with the Shareholder Notice Procedure, such person will not be eligible for election as a director. By requiring advance notice of nominations by shareholders, the Shareholder Notice Procedure affords the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors an opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by the Nominating Committee, to inform shareholders about such qualifications.
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Board Meetings and Committees During 2009,2012, the full Board of Directors met twelvethirteen times, the Compensation Committee met twice times, the Information Technology Committee met threefour times, the Nominating Committee met once,twice, and the Audit Committee met tennine times. Each director attended seventy-five percent or more of all meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board on which he serves.serves, except Mr. Burns, who attended over 64% of the meetings, and Mr. Holder who was absent for health reasons. The Company strongly encourages all members of the Board of Directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders each year. At the prior year's annual shareholder meeting all directors were in attendance.attendance except Mr. Holder. The Board of Directors consists of a majority of "independent directors" as such term is defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Marketplace Rules. The Board of Directors has determined that Hosmer A. Brown, III, E.V. Holder, Jr.,Harry M. Hatfield, Lloyd G. Jackson II, Keith F. Molihan, Neal W. Scaggs and Thomas W. Wright are independent directors. The independent directors met twice in executive session during 2009.2012. The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. Currently, the Board has determined that separating the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders at this time. This structure permits the Chief Executive Officer to focus on the management of the company’s day-to-day operations and ensures a greater role for the Chairman in setting agendas, establishing priorities, and fulfilling the Board’s roles and responsibilities on behalf of the shareholders. The Board of Directors has adopted a formal policy by which shareholders may communicate with members of the Board of Directors by mail addressed to an individual member of the Board, to the full Board, or to a particular committee of the Board, at the following address: c/o Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., 2883 5th Avenue, Huntington, West Virginia 25702. The Board of Directors has three standing committees: a Compensation Committee, a Nominating Committee and an Audit Committee.
Board Role in Risk Oversight The Company faces a variety of risks including credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and reputational risk. An effective risk management system will identify the material risks the Company faces in a timely manner, communicate necessary information to senior executives and the Board related to those material risks, implement appropriate and responsive strategies to manage those risks, and integrate the process of risk management into regular decision-making. The Board has designated the Audit Committee to take the lead in overseeing risk management as the Committee regularly reviews the Company’s internal audit reports, independent compliance audit reports, regulatory examination reports and financial information of the Company. In addition to the Audit Committee, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s strategies and day-to-day operations. Certain Directors are also members of some of the subsidiary banks'banks’ local Board of Directors to independently assess first hand the application of risk management processes at the subsidiary bank level.
Compensation of the Board of Directors Directors who are not full time employees of the Company or any subsidiary receive fees of $1,000 a month for their services. Board members are also reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with their services as directors. Directors receive no compensation for attending committee meetings. Security Ownership by Directors and Officers The following table sets forth certain information concerning ownership of Premier’s Common Stock as of March 31, 20102013 by (i) each of the directors, (ii) each nominee for director, (iii) each executive officer, and (iii)(iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise noted, each beneficial owner listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed next to the owner’s name.
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of 3/17/2010(1) | | | Exercisable Options to Acquire Additional Common Stock as of 3/17/2010(2) | | | Percentage Of Outstanding Shares | | | Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of 3/31/2013(1) | | | Exercisable Options to Acquire Additional Common Stock as of 3/31/2013(2) | | | Percentage Of Outstanding Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Toney K. Adkins, Director | | | 7,191 | | | | | | | * | | | | 7,191 | | | | | | | * | | Hosmer A. Brown, III, Director (3) | | | 65,791 | | | | | | | * | | | Edsel R. Burns, Director (4) | | | 787 | | | | | | | * | | | E.V. Holder, Jr., Director | | | 16,720 | | | | | | | * | | | Harry M. Hatfield, Nominee for Director (3) | | | | 13,000 | | | | | | | * | | Lloyd G. Jackson, II, Nominee for Director | | | | 13,775 | | | | | | | * | | Keith F. Molihan, Director | | | 5,826 | | | | | | | * | | | | 5,826 | | | | | | | * | | Marshall T. Reynolds, Chairman of the Board (5) | | | 830,990 | | | | | | | 10.5% | | | Neal W. Scaggs, Director (6) | | | 42,126 | | | | | | | * | | | Robert W. Walker, Director & Chief Executive Officer (7) | | | 51,763 | | | | 32,751 | | | | 1.1% | | | Marshall T. Reynolds, Chairman of the Board (4) | | | | 830,990 | | | | | | | 10.4 | % | Neal W. Scaggs, Director (5) | | | | 113,230 | | | | | | | 1.4 | % | Robert W. Walker, Director & Chief Executive Officer (6) | | | | 55,513 | | | | 39,000 | | | | 1.2 | % | Thomas W. Wright, Director | | | 45,305 | | | | | | | | * | | | | 45,305 | | | | | | | | * | | Brien M. Chase, Chief Financial Officer (8) | | | 993 | | | | 16,501 | | | | * | | | Brien M. Chase, Chief Financial Officer (7) | | | | 2,023 | | | | 34,501 | | | | * | | Dennis J. Klingensmith, Senior Vice President | | | 2,758 | | | | 17,000 | | | | * | | | | 2,758 | | | | 28,501 | | | | * | | Michael R. Mineer, Senior Vice President (8) | | | | 17,175 | | | | 24,901 | | | | * | | Scot A. Kelley, Vice President, Credit Administration | | | 992 | | | | 5,050 | | | | * | | | | 1,318 | | | | 14,817 | | | | * | | Katrina Whitt, Vice President, Human Resources | | | 0 | | | | 5,050 | | | | * | | | | 0 | | | | 14,650 | | | | * | | All directors and executive officers as a group (13 in number) | | | 1,071,242 | | | | 76,352 | | | | 14.5% | | | | 1,108,104 | | | | 156,370 | | | | 15.9 | % |
_______________
* The percentage of outstanding shares beneficially owned is less than 1%.
(1) | The information contained in this column is based upon information furnished to the Company by the named individuals and the shareholder records of the Company. Except where otherwise indicated, this column represents the number of shares beneficially owned, which includes shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting and/or investment power. |
(2) | Includes options that are exercisableexerciseable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 17, 2010.31, 2013. |
(3) | Includes 6,34012,500 shares owned by spouse. |
(4) | Jointjoint voting and investment power shared with spouse. |
(5)(4) | Includes 67,830 shares owned directly by spouse, with respect to which reporting person has no voting or investment power; 35,286 shares owned by controlled organizations, and 100,836 jointly held with spouse. Mr. Reynolds has pledged 406,870 shares as collateral. |
(6)(5) | Includes 25,301 shares owned by spouse, with respect to which reporting person has no voting or investment power. |
(7)(6) | Includes 9,409 shares owned by spouse, with respect to which reporting person has no voting or investment power. |
(8)(7) | Includes 194 shares owned by spouse, with respect to which reporting person has no voting or investment power. |
(8) | Includes 2,000 shares joint voting and investment power shared with spouse. |
The Company's Chairman of the Board, Marshall T. Reynolds, serves as a director of the following publicly held companies or banks whose shares are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Champion Industries, Inc., Huntington, West Virginia; First Guaranty Bank, Hammond, Louisiana; Portec Rail Products, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Energy Services of America Corporation., Huntington, West Virginia. He has also served as a director of Portec Rail Products, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, which until January 13, 2011 had a class of securities registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, had served as a director of Abigail Adams National Bancorp, Inc. (“Abigail Adams”), Washington, D.C., which until October 1, 2009 had a class of securities registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 19341934; and also served as a director of First State Financial Corporation, Sarasota Florida, which until August 31, 2009, had a class of securities registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Directors Neal W. Scaggs and Thomas W. Wright also serveserved as directors of Portec Rail Products, Inc. and served as directors of First State Financial Corporation. Directors Scaggs, and Keith F. Molihan and Edsel R. Burns also serve as directors of Energy Services of America Corporation. In addition, director Scaggs is also a director of Champion Industries, Inc.
Nominating Committee The Nominating Committee nominates individuals to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors, to serve on other committees of the Board of Directors, and to serve on the boards of directors of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Nominating Committee currently consists of Messrs Scaggs, Molihan and Holder,Jackson, all of whom are independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Marketplace Rules. A copy of the Nominating Committee charter is attached as Exhibit A to this 2010 annual meeting proxy statement.
The Company does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, but the Nominating Committee strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills and expertise to oversee the Company’s business. When considering a potential director candidate, the Nominating Committee evaluates the entirety of each candidate’s experience and qualifications. The Committee looks for personal and professional integrity, demonstrated ability and judgment and business experience. The Nominating Committee will review and consider director nominees recommended by shareholders. There are no differences in the manner in which the Nominating Committee evaluates director nominees based on whether the nominee is recommended by a shareholder.
Audit Committee The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s financial management, internal auditors and independent auditors and reviews the accounting principles and the scope and control of the Company’s financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee makes reports and recommendations to the Board with respect to audit matters and oversees the internal audit function, reviews the internal audit reports, and provides direction for the resolution of internal audit findings and recommendations. The Audit Committee also recommends to the Board the appointment of the firm selected to be independent certified public accountants for the Company and monitors the performance of such firm; reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit and evaluates with the independent certified public accountants the Company's annual audit and annual consolidated financial statements; and reviews with management the status of internal accounting controls and internal audit procedures and results. The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Brown,Hatfield, Molihan, Scaggs, Wright and Molihan.Wright. The Audit Committee is required to have and will continue to have at least three members, all of whom must be "independent directors" as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
The Board determined that Messrs. Brown,Hatfield, Molihan, Scaggs, Molihan, and Wright are financially literate in the areas that are of concern to the Company, and are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. The Board has also determined that Messrs. Brown,Hatfield, Molihan, Scaggs, Molihan, and Wright each meet the independence requirements set forth in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has adopted rules to implement certain requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 pertaining to public company audit committees. One of the rules adopted by the SEC requires a company to disclose whether it has an "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. From May 1, 2005 to October 1, 2008, former Director Edsel R. Burns served as the audit committee financial expert under the rules adopted by the SEC. During that time, the Board also determined that Mr. Burns met the independence requirements set forth in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. However, on October 1, 2008, former Director Burns became President of Energy Services of America Corporation, a publicly traded company of which Marshall T. Reynolds is Chairman. The Company’s Board of Directors believes that in his capacity as President of Energy Services of America Corporation, Director Burns iswas no longer an independent director of Premier. As such, Mr. Burns resigned from the Audit Committee. Based on its review of the criteria of an audit committee financial expert under the rule adopted by the SEC, the Board of Directors does not believe that any other member of the Board of Directors' Audit Committee could be described as an audit committee financial expert. The Board has not yet determined whether to search for an audit committee financial expert to replace Mr. Burns or the appropriate process for such search.
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee of the Board. A copy of the written Audit Committee charter is attached as Exhibit B to this 2010 annual meeting proxy statement. Please review the Audit Committee Report below. Audit Committee Report It is the responsibility of management to prepare the financial statements and the responsibility of Crowe Horwath LLP, the Company’s independent auditors, to audit the financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
In connection with its review of the Company’s financial statements for 2009,2012, the Audit Committee:
· | Has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management; |
· | Has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS)No. 61, as amended (Codification of Statements on Auditing(AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; and |
· | Has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communication with the audit committee concerning independence, and has with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. |
The Audit Committee also discussed with management and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and considered the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Committee reviewed with the independent auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Premier Financial Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2012. Members of the Audit Committee:
/s/ Keith F. Molihan, Chairman
/s/ Neal W. Scaggs
/s/ Hosmer A. Brown, IIIHarry M. Hatfield
/s/ Thomas W. Wright Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Wright, Scaggs and Molihan, all of whom are independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Marketplace Rules. The Committee reviews and determines salaries and other benefits for executive and senior management of the Company and its subsidiaries, reviews and determines the employees to whom stock options are to be granted and the terms of such grants, and reviews the selection of officers who participate in incentive and other compensation plans and arrangements. The Committee establishes the management compensation policy and the general compensation policies of the Company.
The TARP Purchase Agreement subjectssubjected the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the EESA. As part of the Purchase Agreement, the Company adopted the U.S. Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the U.S. Treasury ownsowned any securities acquired from the Company pursuant to the Purchase Agreement or upon exercise of the Warrant. These standards are set forth in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”) and an interim final rule promulgated by the U.S. Treasury under 31 CFR Part 30 on June 15, 2009 and amended on December 7, 2009 (collectively, the “Interim Final Rule.”) The executive compensation and corporate governance standards under the ARRA and the Interim Final Rule remainremained in effect during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under TARP remainsremained outstanding, excluding any period during which the U.S. Treasury holds only the Warrant (the “ARRA Covered Period”). These standards generally applyapplied to our named executive officers and the next twenty highest paid individuals in the Company. Specifically, the standards prohibitprohibited Mr. Walker, as the highest paid individual in the Company, from receiving any cash bonuses or stock option grants during the “ARRA Covered Period” so long as he remainsremained the highest paid individual in the Company. The “ARRA Covered Period” ended on August 10, 2012 when the U.S. Treasury completed its auction of all 22,252 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Shares.
ARRA and the Interim Final Rule requirerequired the Compensation Committee of the Company to meet at least every six months and take the following actions: · | Discuss, evaluate and review all Senior Executive Officer Compensation Plans (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) with the Company’s senior risk officers to ensure that the Senior Executive Officer Compensation Plans dodid not include incentives for the Senior Executive Officers (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) of the Company to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the Company’s value. |
· | Discuss, evaluate and review all Employee Compensation Plans (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) with the Company’s senior risk officers in light of the risks (including the short-term and long-term risks) posed to the Company by such Employee Compensation Plans and how to limit such risks, and |
· | Discuss, evaluate and review all Employee Compensation Plans and identify and eliminate features in the Employee Compensation Plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company to enhance the compensation of any employee. |
The Compensation Committee is required to both disclose the results, and certify completion, of the reviews described above in the Compensation Committee Report. The disclosure and certifications in the form required by the Interim Final Rule are included in the section of this proxy statement captioned “Compensation Committee Report”.
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee of the Board. A copy of the written Compensation Committee charter is attached as Exhibit C to this 2010 annual meeting proxy statement. Please review the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis as well as the Compensation Committee Report below. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The individuals named in the following table are the executive officers of the Company under applicable SEC disclosure rules. The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. Currently, the Board has determined that separating the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders at this time. This structure permits the Chief Executive Officer to focus on the management of the company’s day-to-day operations and ensures a greater role for the Chairman in setting agendas, establishing priorities, and fulfilling the Board’s roles and responsibilities on behalf of the shareholders. Except as otherwise indicated, each executive officer has held the position indicated for the last five years.
Name | Age | Position | Robert W. Walker | 6366 | President and Chief Executive Officer | Brien M. Chase | 4548 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | Dennis Klingensmith | 5659 | Senior Vice President, Premier (Chief Executive Officer, First(First Central Division President, Premier Bank) | Michael R. Mineer | 46 | Senior Vice President, Premier (President, Citizens Deposit Bank & Trust) | Scot A. Kelley | 5356 | Vice President, Credit Administration | Katrina Whitt | 3538 | Vice President, Human Resources |
Mr. Walker has held this position since October, 2001. From September, 1998 until October, 2001 Mr. Walker was President, Boone County Bank, Inc. Prior to that time, Mr. Walker was a Regional Vice President at Bank One, West Virginia, N.A. Mr. Walker also serves on the Company’s asset/liability management committee.committee and is President and Chief Executive Officer of Premier Bank, Inc.
Mr. Chase began his duties as CFO of the Company in April, 2002. From June 1994 to January 2001, Mr. Chase was corporate accounting manager for One Valley Bancorp, Inc. He also served as controller for four of the One Valley Bancorp subsidiaries. Prior to that time, Mr. Chase was the senior accountant for One Valley Bancorp for six years. Mr. Chase also serves on the Company’s asset/liability management committee.committee and is Chief Financial Officer of Premier Bank, Inc.
Mr. Klingensmith has held this position since June, 1998 and has served as CEO of First Central Bank sincefrom November 2001.2001 to April 2011. On April 9, 2011, First Central Bank was merged into Premier Bank, Inc.. Mr. Klingensmith continues his role as President of the First Central Division of Premier Bank. Prior to that time,November 2001, Mr. Klingensmith was an area Chief Executive Officer for Bank One, West Virginia, N. A. Mr. Klingensmith was also acting CEO of Citizens’ Bank (Kentucky), Inc. from November 2002 to February 2003 and acting CEO of Farmers Deposit Bank from June 2003 to October 2003. Mr. Klingensmith also serves on the Company’s asset/liability management committee.
Mr. Mineer was appointed Senior Vice President of Premier on April 1, 2013. Mr. Mineer joined Premier in October 2003 as President and CEO of Citizens Deposit Bank in Vanceburg, Kentucky. Prior to October 2003, Mr. Mineer was a District Manager for U.S. Bank in-charge of multiple branches in Northern Kentucky. Mr. Mineer also serves on the Company’s asset/liability management committee.
Mr. Kelley began his duties in charge of Credit Administration in August, 2003. Prior to that time, Mr. Kelley served Bank One, West Virginia, N.A in several capacities including Manager of Credit Analysis, Internal Auditor and Branch Manager from 1991 to 2003. Mr. Kelley was appointed as Vice President of the Company in March, 2008. Mr. Kelley also serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Premier Bank, Inc.
Ms. Whitt began her duties in charge of Human Resources in July, 2003. From October 1998 to July 2003, Ms. Whitt was Human Resources Generalist for Applied Card Systems. Ms. Whitt was appointed as Vice President of the Company in March, 2008.
For additional information about Mr. Walker, see "ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.” How Compensation Plans Do Not Encourage Excessive Risk Taking
The compensation plans of the Company consist of three basic components, an annual salary, an annual bonus, and grants of stock options. The annual bonus and the granting of stock options are entirely discretionary at the direction of the Board of Directors via the Compensation Committee. They are not based on any formulaic quantification that would encourage the Company’s officers or the officers of its subsidiaries to choose one course of action over another. Rather, the bonuses and the amount of stock options granted are subjective in their determination based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination, with the aid of the Chief Executive Officer, of the individual’s performance toward achieving the Company’s performance and improving overall shareholder value. The annual bonus is relatively small in comparison to an employee’s annual salary. Furthermore, the named executive officers and the next twenty highest paid employees have signed letter agreements with the Company acknowledging that their bonuses are subject to “clawback” provisions should any bonus recipient contribute to manipulation of reported earnings or any other statistic that would enhance the employee’s individual bonus. The Company believes that the “clawback” provision as well as the risk of losing their entire salary in the event of termination is sufficient to deter the manipulation of reported earnings or the taking of excessive risks the would threaten the value of the Company.
The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Human Resources conducted a review of the Company’s compensation policies and have reviewed and discussed their assessments with the Compensation Committee on January 20, 2010.
Given (i) the long term incentive aspect of the base salary and stock option components of the Company’s compensation plan, (ii) the absence of any specific incentive formula in the annual bonus component, (iii) the “clawback” provisions related to the bonus, and (iv) the limitations imposed by ARRA and the Interim Final Rule, the Company does not believe its compensation plans encourage SEOs or any other employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks, including behavior focused on short term rather than long term results and value creation, or encourage manipulation of reported earnings to enhance employee compensation.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Premier has identified only threefour executives that meet the definition of a “named executive officer” to be discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis;Analysis: the Chief Executive Officer, Robert W. Walker; the Chief Financial Officer, Brien M. Chase, and Senior Vice President, Dennis J. Klingensmith.Klingensmith and Vice President, Scot A. Kelley. The following discussion details the Company’s goals in how it compensates these named executive officers, analyzes how the elements in the Company’s compensation programs meet these goals, discusses how the Company determines the actual amounts paid to the named executive officers and finally presents, in tabular form, the amounts of compensation paid to each named executive officer in 2009.2012.
The objectives of Premier’s compensation program are to attract and retain qualified individuals of high integrity, to motivate them to achieve the goals set forth in the Company’s business plan; to link executive and stockholder interests through incentive-based compensation; and to enhance the Company’s performance, measured by both short-term and long-term achievements. Premier believes these goals will provide consistent, long-term shareholder value as well as build a vibrant franchise that will attract locally well known community bankers and customers.
To achieve these goals, Premier compensates its named executive officers using a base salary, a performance based annual bonus, and stock option awards. Premier believes the interests of the Company and its shareholders are served by this three-part approach. Under this approach the compensation of executive officers involves a part of their pay that is “at risk”--namely, the annual bonus and any stock option awards. The variable annual bonus permits individual performance to be recognized on an annual basis, and is based, in significant part, on the performance of the respective executive officer, whereas stock option grants typically only have value to the executive officer if there is a rise in Premier’s stock price beyond the grant date.
To attract and retain qualified individuals of high integrity, Premier pays a competitive base salary to its executive officers and offers the option to participate in customary benefits such as medical insurance and a 401k retirement plan. Salaries are commensurate with an individual’s experience; ability to lead, implement and achieve the Company’s strategic goals; capability in enhancing the Company’s performance in light of potentially adverse changes in banking regulation, interest rates, the local and/or national economy, and other factors beyond the influence of management; and the executive’s level of integrity in dealing with customers, employees, shareholders and the directorship.
To reward the named executive officers as well as other key employees of the Company, Premier pays a discretionary annual bonus. The bonus rewards better than anticipated financial performance, such as asset growth, income enhancing strategies, expense reduction strategies, and non-performing asset resolution. The bonus also rewards other events such as successful regulatory examinations, the ability to recruit replacement management, quality financial disclosures and controls, strategic acquisitions or dispositions and other events the Company may consider from time-to-time. The annual bonuses are entirely discretionary at the direction of the Board of Directors via the Compensation Committee. They are not based on any formulaic quantification that would encourage the Company’s officers or the officers of its subsidiaries to choose one course of action over another. Rather, the bonuses are subjective in their determination based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination, with the aid of the Chief Executive Officer, of the individual’s performance toward achieving the Company’s performance and improving overall shareholder value. Furthermore, the named executive officers and the next twenty highest paid employees have signed letter agreements with the Company acknowledging that their bonuses are subject to “clawback” provisions should any bonus recipient contribute to manipulation of reported earnings or any other statistic that would enhance the employee’s individual bonus.
To reward long-term performance and enhancements to long-term shareholder value, Premier offers stock options to the named executive officers as well as other key employees of the Company. Options are typically granted once a year, near the beginning of the year, in conjunction with a regularly scheduled board of directors meeting. Scheduling decisions are made without regard to anticipated earnings or other major announcements by the Company. As a matter of practice, Premier does not reprice stock options. To reward long-term performance, the options typically vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the grant date and have a maximum ten-year term. Premier believes the vesting schedule also provides incentive for the named executive officers to continue their employment with the Company.
The annual bonus, number of stock options and salary increase, if any, are determined annually. Premier uses surveys conducted by local state banking associations and other industry specific surveys to assess competitive market place compensation for its executive officers and uses ranges of compensation rather than specific targets. The named executive officers do not have employment, severance or change-of-control agreements. They serve at the will of the Board of Directors, which enables Premier to terminate their employment with discretion as to the terms of any severance arrangement.
For any annual bonus, the Chief Executive Officer reviews the estimated full year financial results with the Board of Directors and, if appropriate, an annual bonus pool is determined. Allocations from the pool are made to Premier’s subsidiary banks whose senior management make individual award recommendations. Premier does not use rigid incentive formulas to determine the annual bonus, as simple formulas may tend to improperly favor one aspect of financial performance to the detriment of others, while complex formulas provide no real focus or are inevitably adjusted for unforeseen events. A recommendation as to the bonus to be paid to each executive officer is based on an evaluation by the Chief Executive Officer of their individual performance for the prior year and their contribution toward Premier’s performance as a whole. After reviewing the final full year results, the Compensation Committee, with input from the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the other named executive officers and affiliate bank presidents, uses discretion in evaluating the individual award recommendations and determining the actual bonus amount to be awarded. Premier believes that the annual bonus rewards those high-performing individuals who drive the financial results and long-term performance of the Company.
Similar to the annual bonus, the number of stock options granted to individuals is determined, with input from the Chief Executive Officer, by the Compensation Committee. The number of stock options granted annually is modest so as to minimally affect diluted earnings per share either through the increase in the number of shares outstanding or through recorded stock compensation expense. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the grant date and therefore only have value to the optionee if there is a rise in Premier’s stock price beyond the grant date. Premier believes it is the accumulation of options over time that provides the real incentive for the named executive officers to propel the Company’s value to ever higher levels.
On October 2, 2009, as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and sold to the U.S. Treasury 22,252 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant to purchase 628,587 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value, at an exercise price of $5.31 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $22,252,000 in cash. The TARP Purchase Agreement subjectssubjected the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the EESA. As part of the Purchase Agreement, the Company adopted the U.S. Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the U.S. Treasury owns any securities acquired from the Company pursuant to the Purchase Agreement or upon exercise of the Warrant. The U.S. Treasury may unilaterally amend the Purchase Agreement to comply with applicable Federal statutes.Warrant (the “TARP Period”). The ARRA and the Interim Final Rule imposeimposed limitations on the Company’s executive compensation practices during the TARP Period by, among other things: (i) prohibiting the payment or accrual of any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation to the Company’s single most highly-compensated employee, except in the form and under the limited circumstances permitted by the Interim Final Rule; (ii) prohibiting the payment of golden parachute payments (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) to the Company’s Senior Executive Officers or any of our next five most highly-compensated employees upon a departure from the Company or due to a change in control of the Company, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued; (iii) requiring the Company to “claw back” any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation paid (or under a legally binding obligation to be paid) to a Senior Executive Officer or any of the Company’s next 20 most highly-compensated employees if the payment was based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria; (iv) prohibiting the Company from maintaining any Employee Compensation Plan that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings to enhance the compensation of any of the Company’s employees; (v) prohibiting the Company from maintaining any Senior Executive Officer Compensation Plans that encourage the Senior Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company; (vi) requiring the Company to limit any Employee Compensation Plan that unnecessarily exposes the Company to risk; (vii) prohibiting the Company from providing (formally or informally) “gross-ups” to any of the Company’s Senior Executive Officers or next 20 most highly-compensated employees; (viii) requiring that the Company disclose to the U.S. Treasury and the Company’s primary regulator the amount, nature and justification for offering the most highly-compensated employee any perquisites whose total value exceeds $25,000; (ix) requiring that the Company disclose to the U.S. Treasury and the Company’s primary regulator whether the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors or the Committee engaged a compensation consultant and the services performed by that compensation consultant and any of its affiliates; and (x) requiring that the Company disclose to the U.S. Treasury the identity of its Senior Executive Officers and next 20 most highly-compensated employees, identified by name and title and ranked in descending order of annual compensation.
The ARRA and the Interim Final Rule also required that the Company’s Board of Directors adopt a company-wide policy regarding “excessive or luxury expenditures,” which was adopted on December 16, 2009, and post this policy on the subsidiary banks’ websites. The Company mustwas also required to permit in its proxy statements for annual meetings a non-binding “say on pay” shareholder vote on the compensation of executives, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The Company complied with the “say on pay” requirement in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, and will continue to comply with this requirement.conduct a non-binding “say on pay” shareholder vote as required by Federal securities laws and regulations. Additionally, the Company mustwas required to establish a compensation committee consisting solely of independent directors for the purpose of reviewing employee compensation plans. This compensation committee iswas required to meet at least semiannually to discuss and evaluate employee compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed to the Company from such plans. The Company has taken such steps as are necessary to comply with these requirements, including the evaluation of the composition of the existing Compensation Committee to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of the ARRA.
On July 9, 2012, the U.S. Treasury announced its intent to sell its investment in Premier’s Series A Preferred Stock along with similar investments the U.S. Treasury had made in 11 other financial institutions, principally to qualified institutional buyers. Using a modified Dutch auction methodology that establishes a market price by allowing investors to submit bids at specified increments during the period of July 23, 2012 through July 26, 2012, the U.S. Treasury auctioned all of Premier’s 22,252 Series A Preferred Stock. Premier sought and obtained regulatory permission to participate in the auction. Premier successfully bid to repurchase 10,252 shares of the 22,252 outstanding shares. The auction was completed on August 10, 2012. At the auction’s closing price of $901.03 per share, Premier was able to preserve approximately $1.0 million of capital versus redeeming the Series A Preferred Stock at the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The remaining 12,000 shares are held by private investors. The foregoing limitations on executive compensation (except for the “say on pay” shareholder vote and maintenance of a compensation committee, which are required by Federal securities laws and regulations) terminated upon completion of the U.S. Treasury’s auction of the Series A Preferred Stock on August 10, 2012. Therefore the Company defines the TARP Period as being from October 2, 2009 through August 10, 2012.
In connection with the Company’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program, Mr. Walker, Mr. Chase, Mr. Klingensmith, Mr. Kelley and Ms. Whitt, have entered into letter agreements that modify all compensation and benefit plans during the TARP Period in which the executive officers participateparticipated to the extent necessary to comply with the executive compensation limitations under EESA. The Company’s next 20 most highly-compensated employees have also entered into letter agreements that modify all compensation and benefit plans in which the 20 most highly-compensated employees participateparticipated during the TARP Period to the extent necessary to comply with compensation limitations under the ARRA and the Interim Final Rule.
In arriving at its decision on 2012 executive compensation, the Compensation Committee took into account the affirmative shareholder “say on pay” vote at the previous annual meeting of shareholders and continued to apply the same principles in determining the amounts and types of executive compensation. The specific compensation amounts for each of Premier’s named executive officers for 20092012 reflect the continued improvementstrength and stability in the Company’s financial performance. A more detailed analysis of Premier’s 20092012 financial results is contained in the Management Discussion and Analysis section contained in the annual report to shareholders and our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In determining the named executive officers’ compensation for 2009,2012, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s performance during 2008.2011 in the midst of a successful conversion to a new operating system, and a successful completion of the merger of five subsidiary banks to form Premier Bank, Inc. One of the goals achieved by merging the bank charters together was to alleviate the restrictions placed on the Company’s operations by the Written Agreements entered into by Adams National Bank with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and Consolidated Bank and Trust (“CB&T”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB”). With the surrender of the Adams National Bank charter upon consummation of the merger to form Premier Bank, Inc., the Written Agreement with the OCC was terminated. Similarly, with the merger of CB&T into Premier Bank, Inc., the provisions of the Written Agreement with the FRB that applied to CB&T were concluded. Net income decreased from $9,172,000 in 2010 to $7,168,000 for 2011 largely due to increased from $7,119,000expenses, primarily data processing expenses and expenses related to converting data processing systems. Otherwise, net interest income and non-interest income increased in 20072011, partially offset by a higher provision for loan losses. Similar to $7,536,000 for 2008. Earningsnet income, earnings per share decreased from $1.36$1.00 in 20072010 to $1.25$0.75 in 2008. The net interest margin declined from 4.42% in 2007 to 4.21% in 2008. Net overhead costs increased slightly from 2.32% of average earning assets in 2007 to 2.36% of average earning assets in 2008. Non-performing assets increased from $5,807,000 at December 31, 2007 to $9,827,000 at December 31, 2008. Net loan charge-offs remained low but increased to $400,000 in 2008 from $86,000 in 2007. Most of the negative trends in these statistics were largely the result of acquiring two banks in 2008, Traders Bankshares, Inc. and Citizens First Bank. However, also2011, largely due to the acquisitions, loans outstanding increased from $346,570,000 at December 31, 2007related to $467,111,000 at December 31, 2008. Total deposits increased from $449,033,000 at December 31, 2007 to $589,182,000 at December 31, 2008. And total assets increased from $549,255,000 at December 31, 2007 to $724,465,000 at December 31, 2008. The Company continued paying quarterly cash dividends to shareholders during 2008, increasing the quarterly dividend to $0.11 per share in June 2008. On December 31, 2008, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Abigail Adams National Bancorp, Inc. (“Abigail Adams”), a two bank holding company with $436 million of total assets at December 31, 2008 with locations in and around Washington, DC and Richmond, Virginia.converting data processing systems.
Based upon an evaluation of his contributions toward these and other events in 2008,2011, his leadership performance over a significantly larger company, and his potential to improve long-term shareholder value, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Walker a salary increase of approximately $25,000 in 20092012 to $245,500$325,000 annually. Despite the specific accomplishments achieved by Premier in 2011 and Mr. Walker’s integral part in overseeing the successful conversion to the Fidelity Horizon integrated operating system, the ARRA and the Interim Final Rule imposed limitations on the Company’s executive compensation practices prohibiting the payment or accrual of any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation to Mr. Walker as the Company’s single most highly-compensated employee during the TARP Period. The prohibitions also prevented Premier from granting Mr. Walker any additional stock options so long as the Company continued to participate in the Troubled Asset Relief Program - Capital Purchase Program. Considering the specific accomplishments achieved by Premier after the TARP Period ended in 20082012, including the integration of three subsidiary banks, the termination of the Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and Mr. Walker’s integral partthe capital preserved by participating in obtaining regulatory approval for and consummating the mergers with Citizens First Bank, Inc. and Traders Bankshares, Inc.,U.S. Treasury’s auction of the subsequent merger of those two institutions into one subsidiary bank, and in negotiating and executing the December 31, 2008 merger agreement with Abigail Adams,Company’s Series A Preferred Shares, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Walker a $25,000$35,000 cash bonus which was paid in February 2009. To continue to incent Mr. Walker to continue with his successful turnaround of Premier’s financial performance, to successfully integrate the acquisitions of Citizens First Bank, Inc. and Traders Bankshares, Inc., to complete and facilitate the successful acquisition of Abigail Adams and to reward him for long-term improvements in the stock’s value, the Compensation Committee granted him 10,000 options to buy Premier stock at $6.55 per share (the closing price on the February 18, 2009 grant date.) This grant increased Mr. Walker’s total options to buy Premier stock to 42,750.December 2012. Additional information on Mr. Walker’s 20092012 compensation is detailed in the tables below. Based upon an evaluation of his contributions toward achieving the Company’s performance in 20082011 as summarized above, his leadership in providing clear, concise and quality financial disclosures to the Board of Directors and shareholders through Premier’s annual and quarterly reports and the proxy statement, and his potential to improve long-term shareholder value, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Chase a salary increase of $5,137 in 2009 to $102,000approximately $121,680 annually. Considering the specific accomplishments achieved by Premier in 20082011 and Mr. Chase’s integral part in the accounting for loans acquired at a discount, preparation of the regulatory filings to facilitate the required approvals for the mergers with Citizens First Bank, Inc. and Traders Bankshares, Inc., the calculation and implementationmerger of the required accounting for business combinations, the preparation of the regulatory filings to facilitate the subsequent merger of those two institutions,five subsidiary banks completed in April 2011, and Mr. Chase’s integral partparticipation in negotiating and executing the merger agreement with Abigail Adams,integration of the five subsidiary bank operations, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Chase an $18,000a $20,000 cash bonus which was paid in February 2009.March 2012. To continue to incent Mr. Chase to continue improve Premier’s financial performance, to successfully integrate the acquisitions of Citizens First Bank, Inc. and Traders Bankshares, Inc., to complete and facilitatecontinue with the successful acquisitionintegration of Abigail Adamsthe five subsidiary banks and to reward him for long-term improvements in the stock’s value, the Compensation Committee granted him 5,00010,000 options to buy Premier stock at $6.55$7.47 per share (the closing price on the February 18, 2009March 21, 2012 grant date.) This grant increased Mr. Chase’s total options to buy Premier stock to 21,500.46,500, some of which were exercised before the end of 2012. Additional information on Mr. Chase’s 20092012 compensation is detailed in the tables below.
Based upon an evaluation of his contributions toward achieving the Company’s performance in 2008 as summarized above;2011, his banking insight as CEOPresident of First Central Division of Premier Bank, Inc. located in Premier’s fastestfasted growing market;market, his leadership at First Central which brought in over $3.5$1.6 million of new deposits to that bank, $14.4$3.4 million of net new net loan volume to the Company and his potential to improve long-term shareholder value, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Klingensmith a salary increase of $8,262 in 2009 to $135,362approximately $140,288 annually. Considering the specific accomplishments achieved by Premier and the First Central Division of Premier Bank in 2008,2011, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Klingensmith a $9,000$10,000 cash bonus which was paid in February 2009.March 2012. To continue to incent Mr. Klingensmith to continue improve Premier’s financial performance and to reward him for long-term improvements in the stock’s value, the Compensation Committee granted him 3,0008,000 options to buy Premier stock at $6.55$7.47 per share (the closing price on the February 18, 2009March 21, 2012 grant date.) This grant increased Mr. Klingensmith’s total options to buy Premier stock to 20,000.39,000, some of which were exercised before the end of 2012. Additional information on Mr. Klingensmith’s 20092012 compensation is detailed in the tables below.
Based upon an evaluation of his contributions toward achieving the Company’s performance in 2011, his leadership over the evaluation, underwriting and presentation of larger loans to the Premier loan committee, his direct supervision over Premier’s lending policy and practices and his potential to improve long-term shareholder value by identifying and suggesting solutions to mitigate credit risk in the Company’s larger loan relationships, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Kelley a salary increase to $80,000 annually. Considering the specific accomplishments achieved by Premier in 2011 and his direct role in integrating the credit administration function of Premier Bank, Inc. including facilitating external reviews of the loan portfolio by banking regulators and other third parties, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Kelley an $8,500 cash bonus which was paid in March 2012. To continue to incent Mr. Kelley to continue to improve Premier’s financial performance and to reward him for long-term inprovements in the stock’s value, the Compensation Committee granted him 6,500 options to buy Premier stock at $7.47 per share (the closing price on the March 21, 2012 grant date.) This grant increased Mr. Kelley’s total options to buy Premier stock to 21,150. Additional information on Mr. Kelley’s 2012 compensation is detailed in the tables below.
Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above. Based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated into Premier’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20092012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Compensation Committee certifies that, in accordance with the requirements of the ARRA and the Interim Final Rule:Rule during the TARP Period which ended on August 10, 2012:
· | It has reviewed with the Company’s senior risk officers all Senior Executive Officer Compensation Plans (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) and has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that these plans dodid not encourage the Senior Executive Officers (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) of the Company to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company. |
· | It has reviewed with the Company’s senior risk officers all Employee Compensation Plans (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) and has made all reasonable efforts to limit any unnecessary risks these plans pose to the Company, and |
· | It has reviewed all Employee Compensation Plans to eliminate any features of these plans that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of the Company to enhance the compensation of any employee. |
How Compensation Plans Do Not Encourage Excessive Risk Taking The compensation plans of the Company consist of three basic components, an annual salary, an annual bonus, and grants of stock options. The annual bonus and the granting of stock options are entirely discretionary at the direction of the Board of Directors via the Compensation Committee. They are not based on any formulaic quantification that would encourage the Company’s officers or the officers of its subsidiaries to choose one course of action over another. Rather, the bonuses and the amount of stock options granted are subjective in their determination based upon the Compensation Committee’s determination, with the aid of the Chief Executive Officer, of the individual’s performance toward achieving the Company’s performance and improving overall shareholder value. The annual bonus is relatively small in comparison to an employee’s annual salary. Furthermore, the named executive officers and the next twenty highest paid employees have signed letter agreements with the Company acknowledging that their bonuses paid during the TARP Period are subject to “clawback” provisions should any bonus recipient contribute to manipulation of reported earnings or any other statistic that would enhance the employee’s individual bonus. The Company believes that the “clawback” provision as well as the risk of losing their entire salary in the event of termination is sufficient to deter the manipulation of reported earnings or the taking of excessive risks the would threaten the value of the Company. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Human Resources conducted a review of the Company’s compensation policies and have reviewed and discussed their assessments with the Compensation Committee during a meeting of the Compensation Committee held on March 13, 2012. Given (i) the long term incentive aspect of the base salary and stock option components of the Company’s compensation plan, (ii) the absence of any specific incentive formula in the annual bonus component, (iii) the “clawback” provisions related to the bonus paid during the TARP Period, (iv) that the named executive officers do not have employment, severance or change-of-control agreements but serve at the will of the Board of Directors, and (v) the limitations imposed by ARRA and the Interim Final Rule during the TARP Period, the Company does not believe its compensation plans encourage SEOs or any other employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks, including behavior focused on short term rather than long term results and value creation, or encourage manipulation of reported earnings to enhance employee compensation.
Members of the Compensation Committee:
/s/ Thomas W. Wright, Chairman
/s/ Keith F. Molihan
/s/ Neal W. Scaggs
Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes compensation earned in each of the three years ended December 31, 20092012 by the Company's named executive officers.
Name and principal position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards (1) ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation (2) (3) ($) | Total ($) | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Option Awards (1) ($) | All Other Compensation (2) (3) ($) | Total ($) | Robert W. Walker (4) | 2009 | 245,519 | 25,000 | --- | 3,700 | --- | 12,177 | 286,396 | 2012 | 325,000 | 35,000 | --- | 24,650 | 384,650 | President and CEO | 2008 | 220,500 | 25,000 | --- | 25,500 | --- | 11,018 | 282,018 | 2011 | 300,000 | --- | --- | 21,782 | 321,782 | | 2007 | 210,000 | 20,000 | --- | 19,050 | --- | 9,820 | 258,870 | 2010 | 270,885 | --- | --- | 10,240 | 281,125 | Brien M. Chase | 2009 | 110,435 | 18,000 | --- | 1,850 | --- | 4,843 | 135,128 | 2011 | 121,680 | 20,000 | 23,400 | 6,712 | 171,792 | Senior Vice President | 2008 | 102,000 | 16,500 | --- | 12,700 | --- | 4,411 | 135,661 | 2011 | 117,000 | 20,000 | 16,300 | 6,532 | 159,832 | and CFO | 2007 | 96,863 | 10,000 | --- | 9,525 | --- | 3,818 | 120,206 | 2010 | 111,219 | 30,000 | 7,050 | 6,051 | 154,320 | Dennis Klingensmith | 2009 | 135,362 | 9,000 | --- | 1,110 | --- | 6,936 | 152,408 | | Sr. Vice President and | 2008 | 127,100 | 9,000 | --- | 12,750 | --- | 6,507 | 155,357 | | CEO First Central Bank | 2007 | 122,200 | 10,000 | --- | 9,525 | --- | 5,975 | 147,700 | | Dennis J. Klingensmith | | 2011 | 140,288 | 10,000 | 18,720 | 7,224 | 176,232 | Senior Vice President and | | 2011 | 137,537 | 10,000 | 13,040 | 7,114 | 167,691 | EVP Premier Bank | | 2010 | 133,934 | 9,000 | 4,230 | 6,966 | 154,130 | Scot A. Kelley | | 2012 | 80,000 | 8,500 | 15,210 | 4,757 | 108,467 | Vice President - | | 2011 | 74,148 | 8,250 | 9,780 | 4,400 | 96,578 | Credit Administration | | 2010 | 72,000 | 8,000 | 2,820 | 4,267 | 87,087 |
________________________
(1) | The amounts reported in this column represent the number of options granted times the grant date fair value of stock options granted to each of the named executive officers in accordance with FAS 123R.FASB Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. More information about stock compensation expense, including the assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value, is included in footnote 14 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20092012 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These amounts reflect the Company's accounting expense for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be ultimately recognized by the named executive officers. |
(2) | The Company provides automobiles to Mr. Walker and Mr. Klingensmith due to their extensive travel for business purposes. The Company's expense for providing the vehicle for the executive's personal use along with all other perquisites does not exceed $10,000 and therefore is not included in this table. |
(3) | All other compensation consists of the Company's matching contributions to the executive's 401k plan account and amounts paid by the Company for the executive's participation in the Company’s benefit programs. |
(4) | Premier's participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program onfrom October 2, 2009 prohibitsthrough August 10, 2012 prohibited Mr. Walker, as the Company’s highest paid executive officer, from receiving a cash bonus or stock options. The amount presented for the 20092012 bonus reflect payments made in the firstfourth quarter of 20092012 related to Mr. Walker's 2008 performance.performance after August 10, 2012. The amount presented for the 2009 stock option value reflects the estimated fair value2012 and 2011 all other compensation includes $14,437 and $12,037 of Walker's options granted in February 2009.matching contributions to Mr. Walker’s 401k plan account, respectively. |
Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 20092012 The following table provides information about options granted to the named executive officers in 20092012
Name | Grant Date | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | Robert W. Walker (2) | Mar-21-2012 | n/a | --- | --- | --- | Brien M. Chase | Mar-21-2012 | n/a | 10,000 | 7.47 | 23,400 | Dennis J. Klingensmith | Mar-21-2012 | n/a | 8,000 | 7.47 | 18,720 | Scot A. Kelley | Mar-21-2012 | n/a | 6,500 | 7.47 | 15,210 |
| | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: | All Other Option Awards: | | | Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | Robert W. Walker | Feb-18-2009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 10,000 | 6.55 | 3,700 | Brien M. Chase | Feb-18-2009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 5,000 | 6.55 | 1,850 | Dennis J. Klingensmith | Feb-18-2009 | n/a | n/a | n/a | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3,000 | 6.55 | 1,110 |
________________________
(1) | Options awarded in 20092012 vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 18, 2010.March 21, 2013. The exercise price of the options awarded in 20092012 was the closing price on February 18, 2009,March 21, 2012, the date of grant. The $0.37$2.34 per share grant date fair value of each option awarded was determined using SFAS 123Rin accordance with FASB Topic 718 as more fully described in footnote 14 to Premier's December 31, 20092012 Financial Statements. |
(2) | Premier's participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program onfrom October 2, 2009 limitsthrough August 10, 2012 limited the amount Mr. Walker cancould receive in a cash bonus or in stock options. The 2009 stock option award to Mr. Walker was granted on February 18, 2009, prior to the Company's participation inAdditional information regarding the TARP Capital Purchase Program.Program can be found in footnote 24 to Premier’s December 31, 2012 Financial Statements. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20092012 Fiscal Year-End The following table provides information on the current holdings of stock options by the namenamed executive officers. This table includes unexercised and unvested option awards. Each option grant is shown separately for each named executive officer.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | Name | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options | Option Exercise Price | Option Expiration | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested | | Exercisable | Unexercisable | (#) | ($) | Date | (#) | ($) | (#) | ($) | Robert W. Walker | 0 | 10,000 | n/a | 6.55 | Feb-18-2019 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 3,334 | 6,666 | n/a | | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 3,334 | 1,666 | n/a | 14.22 | Jan-17-2017 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 5,000 | 0 | n/a | 16.00 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 5,000 | 0 | n/a | 11.62 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 4,000 | 0 | n/a | 9.30 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 3,750 | 0 | n/a | 7.96 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | Brien M. Chase | 0 | 5,000 | n/a | 6.55 | Feb-18-2019 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | | 3,333 | n/a | | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 1,667 | 833 | n/a | 14.22 | Jan-17-2017 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,500 | 0 | n/a | 16.00 | Feb-16-2016 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,500 | 0 | n/a | 11.62 | Jan-19-2015 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,000 | 0 | n/a | 9.30 | Feb-18-2014 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,000 | 0 | n/a | 7.96 | Jan-15-2013 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | Dennis J. Klingensmith | 0 | 3,000 | n/a | 6.55 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 1,000 | 2,000 | n/a | | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,000 | 1,000 | n/a | 14.22 | Jan-17-2017 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 3,000 | 0 | n/a | 16.00 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 3,000 | 0 | n/a | 11.62 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,500 | 0 | n/a | 9.30 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | | 2,500 | 0 | n/a | 7.96 | | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Option Awards | | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options | Option Exercise Price | Option Expiration | | Exercisable | Unexercisable | (#) | ($) | Date | Robert W. Walker | 10,000 | 0 | n/a | 6.55 | | | 10,000 | 0 | n/a | 12.92 | | | 5,000 | 0 | n/a | 14.22 | | | 5,000 | 0 | | 16.00 | | | 5,000 | 0 | | 11.62 | | | 4,000 | 0 | | 9.30 | Feb-18-2014 | Brien M. Chase | 0 | 10,000 | | 7.47 | | | 3,334 | 6,666 | | 6.95 | | | 3,334 | 1,666 | | 8.90 | | | 5,000 | 0 | | 6.55 | | | 5,000 | 0 | | 12.92 | | | 2,500 | 0 | | 14.22 | | | 2,500 | 0 | | 16.00 | | | 2,500 | 0 | | 11.62 | | | 2,000 | 0 | | 9.30 | | Dennis J. Klingensmith | 0 | 8,000 | | 7.47 | | | 2,667 | 5,333 | | 6.95 | | | 2,000 | 1,000 | | 8.90 | | | 3,000 | 0 | | 6.55 | | | 3,000 | 0 | | 12.92 | | | 3,000 | 0 | | 14.22 | | | 3,000 | 0 | | 16.00 | | | 3,000 | 0 | | 11.62 | | | 2,500 | 0 | | 9.30 | | Michael R. Mineer | 0 | 6,500 | | 7.47 | Mar-21-2022 | | 2,000 | 4,000 | | 6.95 | Mar-16-2021 | | 1,334 | 666 | | 8.90 | Mar-17-2020 | | 1,650 | 0 | | 6.55 | Feb-18-2019 | | 1,500 | 0 | | 12.92 | Feb-20-2018 | | 1,500 | 0 | | 14.22 | Jan-17-2017 | | 1,000 | 0 | | 16.00 | Feb-16-2016 | | 1,000 | 0 | n/a | 11.62 | Jan-19-2015 |
Director Compensation The following table summarizes compensation earned in 20092012 by the Company's directors.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Option Awards ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | Toney K. Adkins | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | Hosmer A. Brown, III(1) | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 5,000 | n/a | n/a | 5,000 | Edsel R. Burns(2) | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 10,000 | n/a | n/a | 10,000 | E.V. Holder, Jr. | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | | Harry M. Hatfield | | 7,000 | n/a | n/a | 7,000 | E.V. Holder, Jr. (1) | | 5,000 | n/a | n/a | 5,000 | Lloyd G. Jackson II | | 7,000 | n/a | n/a | 7,000 | Keith F. Molihan | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | Marshall T. Reynolds | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | Neal W. Scaggs | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | Robert W. Walker | (1) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 | (3) | n/a | n/a | 0 | Thomas W. Wright | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 12,000 | 12,000 | n/a | n/a | 12,000 |
________________________
(1) | Directors Brown and Holder did not seek re-election to serve as directors beyond the June 20, 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. |
(2) | Director Burns resigned from the board effective November 14, 2012. |
(3) | In accordance with Company policy, as an employee of the Company, Mr. Walker does not receive any director compensation. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS TheDuring 2012, the Company's subsidiariessubsidiary banks have made,had, and expect to makehave in the future to the extent permitted by applicable federal and state banking laws, bank loans inlending transactions with certain of the ordinary course of business to directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and their affiliates and associatesassociates. The transactions, which at times involved loans in excess of $120,000, were in the ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and collateral,repayment terms, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. In the opinion ofpersons not related to the Company such loans door its subsidiaries, and did not involve more than athe normal risk of collectibilitycollectability or present other unfavorable features. The Company's subsidiary banks are subject to federal laws and regulations governing loans to officers and directors. In addition, the Company'sCompany’s banking subsidiaries have engaged, and in the future may engage, in transactions with such persons and their affiliates and associates as a depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, fiduciary and provider of other similar services.
The Company has adopted a policy to conduct an appropriate review of all related party transactions on an ongoing basis, pursuant to which all material or related transactions with any director, officer or employee or other person or entity with which such director, officer, or employee is affiliated must be on terms no less favorable to the corporation than those that are generally available from unaffiliated third parties and must be approved and ratified by the audit committee by majority vote of its members who do not have an interest in the transaction. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008,2012, 2011, and 2007,2010, the Company or its subsidiaries have paid approximately $439,000, $218,000,$385,000, $562,000, and $231,000,$508,000, respectively, for commercial printing services, statement rendering services and office supplies and furniture from Champion Industries, Inc., Huntington, West Virginia, of which the Company's Chairman of the Board, Marshall T. Reynolds, is its Chief Executive Officer and a principal shareholder and the Company’s director Toney K. Adkins iswas President and Chief Operating Officer.Officer through December 31, 2011. The Company or its subsidiaries have paid The Harrah and Reynolds Corporation, a corporation controlled by Marshall T. Reynolds, approximately $632,000, $533,000,$797,000, $863,000, and $459,000$889,000 in 2009, 2008,2012, 2011, and 2007,2010, respectively, to permit employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to participate in a medical benefit plan sponsored and administered by The Harrah and Reynolds Corporation. The Company leases its headquarters facility at 2883 Fifth Avenue, Huntington, West Virginia from River City Properties, LLC, an entity 12.5% owned by Chairman of the Board of Directors Marshall T. Reynolds. The lease, for 5,900 square feet, had a 5 year term commencing in September 2002 and washas been subsequently renewed for an additional five year termterms ending in September 20072017 with annual rent of $8.50 per square foot the first year and thereafter inflation adjusted. The Company believes that the terms of this lease, which were approved by the Board of Directors, are no less favorable to the Company than those available from unrelated third parties. Annual lease payments totaled approximately $52,000, $52,000 and $52,000 in 2009, 20082012, 2011 and 2007,2010, respectively. On April 30, 2008, the Company executed and delivered to First Guaranty Bank of Hammond, Louisiana a Promissory Note and Business Loan Agreement dated April 30, 2008 for the principal amount of $11,550,000 bearing interest floating daily at the “Wall Street Journal” prime rate (the “Index”) minus 1.00% and requiring 59 monthly principal payments of $50,000 and one final payment of $8,600,000 due at maturity on April 30, 2013. On December 31, 2009, the Company executed and delivered to First Guaranty Bank a modification agreement whereby the interest rate would be fixed at 3.96% through the remaining maturity of the note. TheAt December 31, 2012, the note iswas secured by a pledge of 25% of Premier’s 100% interest in Boone CountyPremier Bank (a wholly owned subsidiary) under a Commercial Pledge Agreement dated April 30, 2008.modified on May 3, 2011. The proceeds of this note were used to fund the $9,000,000 of cash needed to purchase Traders Bankshares, Inc. and to refinance the remaining $2,550,000 balance of Premier’s outstanding note with First Guaranty Bank dated January 31, 2006.
In conjunction with the modification agreement with First Guaranty Bank, the Company executed and delivered a Promissory Note and Business Loan Agreement dated December 31, 2009 establishing a line of credit in the principal amount of $1,000,000 bearing interest floating daily at the “Wall Street Journal” prime rate (initially 3.25%), with a floor of 4.50%. Under the terms of the Promissory Note, the Company may request and receive advances from First Guaranty Bank from time to time, but the aggregate outstanding principal balance under the Promissory Note at any time shall not exceed $1,000,000 and the right to request and receive monies from First Guaranty Bank shall cease and terminate on June 30, 2011. Since June 30, 2011, the line of credit has been extended to June 30, 2013 and the principal amount has been increased to $2,000,000. The Promissory Note is secured by the same pledge of 25% of Premier’s interest in Premier Bank. At December 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding debt on this line of credit from First Guaranty Bank. Premier’s chairmanChairman owns approximately 27.6%27.1% of the voting stock of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. the parent company of First Guaranty Bank. However, Premier’s board of directors determined during its vote to authorize the company to enter into the loan transaction that the terms of the financing, including the interest rate and collateral, were no less favorable than those which could be obtained from other financial institutions.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Based upon a review of filings with the SEC and representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all of the Company’s directors and executive officers complied during fiscal 20072012 with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act except that Director Hosmer A. Brown, III on November 24, 2009 amended his Form 3 originally filed in October 2001 to include shares owned by his spouse and filed one late report with respect to one transaction reporting his spouse’s shares acquired on October 9, 2009.of 1934.
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (Item 2 on Proxy)
At its meeting held on April 21, 2010,19, 2013, the Audit Committee appointed Crowe Horwath LLP to serve as the Company’s independent public accountants and auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.2013. Crowe Horwath LLP has served as the Company’s independent public accountants and auditors since the 1995 fiscal year.
Representatives of Crowe Horwath LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Audit Fees Audit fees and expenses billed to the Company by Crowe Horwath LLP for the audit of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092012 and December 31, 2008,2011, and for review of the Company's financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, are as follows:
| Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | | $278,000 | $215,000 | |
Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | $ 185,000 | $ 225,000 |
Audit Related Fees Audit related fees and expenses billed to the Company by Crowe Horwath LLP for years 20092012 and 20082011 for services related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements that were not included under the heading "Audit Fees", are as follows:
| Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | | $25,120 | $ 20,415 | |
Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | $ 48,250 | $ 59,523 |
Tax Fees Tax fees and expenses billed to the Company by Crowe Horwath LLP for fiscal years 20092012 and 20082011 for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, consisting primarily of preparing the Company's federal and state income tax returns for the previous fiscal periods and inclusive of expenses are as follows
| Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | | $72,475 | $ 42,350 | |
Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | $ 75,035 | $ 79,080 |
All Other Fees Fees and expenses billed to the Company by Crowe Horwath LLP for all other services provided during fiscal years 20092012 and 20082011 are as follows:
| Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | | $ 1,125 | $ 6,275 | |
Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | $ 7,650 | $ 8,090 |
In 2004, the Audit Committee established a policy whereby the independent auditor is required to seek pre-approval by the Committee of all audit and permitted non-audit services by providing a prior description of the services to be performed and specific estimates for each such service.
The Audit Committee approved all of the services performed by Crowe Horwath LLP during fiscal 2009.2012.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining the independent accountant’s independence.
The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the 20102013 fiscal year.
The appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP will be deemed ratified if votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed votes cast against it. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the proposal.
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Item(Item 3 on Proxy)
As described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 1619 and in the compensation tables beginning on page 2226 of this proxy statement, the Company’s compensation programs are designed to:
· | attract and retain qualified individuals of high integrity; |
· | motivate them to achieve the goals set forth in the Company’s business plan |
· | link executive and stockholder interests through incentive-based compensation |
· | enhance the Company’s performance, measured by both short-term and long-term achievements. |
We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive, are focused on pay for performance principles and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We also believe that both the Company and shareholders benefit from responsive corporate governance policies and constructive and consistent dialogue. In connection with our participation inUnder the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Plan,Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) we are required to submitsubmitting a proposal allowing our shareholders to cast an advisory vote on our compensation program at the annual meeting of shareholders. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives you, as a shareholder of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., an opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation we pay to our named executive officers through the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. approve the compensation of its executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosure regarding the compensation of the named executive officers (together with the accompanying narrative disclosure) contained in this Proxy Statement.”
Under the ARRA, yourYour vote is advisory and will not be binding upon our Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. We believe that both the Company and its shareholders benefit from maintaining a constructive dialogue with its shareholders. This proposal is only one part of our corporate governance program and practices that maintain this dialogue with our shareholders and our commitment to the creation of long-term shareholder value.
The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the resolution to approve the compensation of named executive officers employed by the Company as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and accompanying tables beginning on page 16.15. The Company’s executive compensation disclosed in this proxy statement will be approved if votes cast in its favor of the proposal exceed votes cast against it. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the proposal. At the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, we provided our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting, and our shareholders approved the proposal, with more than 97% of the votes cast in favor.
FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Item 4 on Proxy) Dodd-Frank requires us, not less frequently than once every 6 years, to submit a proposal allowing our shareholders to vote, in an advisory, non-binding vote, on whether the shareholder vote to approve executive compensation (Proposal No. 4 in the accompanying form of proxy) will occur every 1, 2 or 3 years. As a shareholder of the Company, you are being provided the opportunity to vote on the frequency of the vote on executive compensation through the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the shareholder vote to approve executive compensation shall occur every 1, 2 or 3 years, as marked in the accompanying form of proxy.” Your vote is advisory and will not be binding upon our Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of submitting to shareholders a resolution to afford shareholders the opportunity to vote on executive compensation. The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the resolution to vote on executive compensation every year. The accompanying form of proxy provides for four choices (every 1, 2 or 3 years), or abstain. Shareholders are voting on one of these periods, and are not voting to approve or disapprove the Company’s recommendation. The frequency of the shareholder vote on executive compensation (every 1, 2 or 3 years) will be determined by a plurality of votes cast “FOR” the year receiving the highest number of votes, even if such votes do not constitute a majority. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the proposal.
CODE OF ETHICS The Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on November 19, 2003 that applies to all of the Company's officers, directors and employees and a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer which supplements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (collectively the "Codes") which are intended to promote honest and ethical conduct, full and accurate reporting and compliance with laws. We have filed copies of the Codes with the SEC as an exhibit to our December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS Any shareholder proposal intended to be presented at the 20112014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by the Company by January 13, 201116, 2014 in order to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the 20112014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board of Directors for the next annual meeting of shareholders will confer discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal presented at the meeting, unless the Company is provided with notice of such proposal no later than March 31, 2011.April 1, 2014. However, even if notice is timely received, the proxies may nevertheless be entitled to exercise discretionary authority on the matter to the extent permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.
OTHER MATTERS The only matters to be considered at the meeting or any adjournment thereof, so far as known to the Board of Directors, are those set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and routine matters incident to the conduct of the meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors intends that the persons named in the accompanying proxy form, or their substitutes, will vote the shares represented by such proxy form in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ E. V. Holder, Jr.Toney K. Adkins E.V. Holder, Jr.Toney K. Adkins
Assistant Secretary
Huntington, West Virginia May 13, 201016, 2013
EXHIBIT A
NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER
The nominating committee of the board of directors shall consist of a minimum of three directors. Members of the committee shall be appointed and may be removed by the board of directors. All members of the committee shall be independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Manual.
The purpose of the committee shall be to assist the board in identifying qualified individuals to become board members and in determining the composition of the board of directors and its committees.
In furtherance of this purpose, the committee shall have the following authority and responsibilities:
1. | To lead the search for individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors and to select director nominees to be recommended to the board for its approval and to be presented for shareholder approval at the annual meeting. The committee shall select individuals as director nominees who shall have the highest personal and professional integrity, who shall have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and who shall be most effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to the board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the shareholders. |
2. | To review the board of directors' committee structure and to recommend to the board for its approval directors to serve as members of each committee. The committee shall review and recommend committee slates annually and shall recommend additional committee members to fill vacancies as needed. |
3. | To review on an annual basis director compensation and benefits. |
The committee shall have the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as the committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion.
The committee shall have the authority to retain any search firm engaged to assist in identifying director candidates, and to retain outside counsel and any other advisors as the committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion. The committee shall have sole authority to approve related fees and retention terms.
The committee shall report its actions and recommendations to the board after each committee meeting. The committee shall review at least annually the adequacy of this charter and recommend any proposed changes to the board for approval.
Approved PFBI Nominating Committee
April 17, 2013
Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT B
PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Revised as of April 21, 2010
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
I. PURPOSE
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to act on behalf of the Board of Directors and oversee all material aspects of the Corporation’s reporting, control, and audit functions, particularly the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Corporation and the audits of the financial statements of the Corporation, including reviewing: the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Corporation to any governmental body or the public; the Corporation’s systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management, the Committee and the Board have established; and the Corporation’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally. Consistent with this function, the Audit Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the corporation’s policies, procedures and practices at all levels. The Audit Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to:
Be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditors engaged by the Corporation (including resolution of disagreements between management of the Corporation and such auditors regarding financial reporting for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit services). The external auditors shall report directly to the audit committee.
· | Be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditors engaged by the Corporation (including resolution of disagreements between management of the Corporation and such auditors regarding financial reporting for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit services). The external auditors shall report directly to the audit committee. |
Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Corporation’s financial reporting process and internal control system.
· | Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Corporation’s financial reporting process and internal control system. |
Review and appraise the audit efforts of the Corporation's independent accountants and internal auditing department.
· | Review and appraise the audit efforts of the Corporation's independent accountants and internal auditing department. |
Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management, the internal auditing department and the Board of Directors.
· | Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management, the internal auditing department and the Board of Directors. |
The Audit Committee will primarily fulfill these responsibilities by carrying out the activities enumerated in Section IV of this Charter.
II. COMPOSITION
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors appointed by the Board, each of whom shall meet the independence and experience requirements of the NASDNASDAQ Manual and other applicable laws and regulations. Those requirements onPursuant to Section 407 of the dateSarbanes-Oxley Act of revision of this charter are listed in Exhibit A (to the Audit Charter) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit B Page 1 of 65
2002 (SOXA), the SEC has adopted rules requiring an issuer to disclose whether it has at least one “audit committee financial expert” serving on its audit committee, and if so whether the expert is independent of management. A company that does not have an audit committee financial expert must disclose this fact and explain why. The board of directors of the issuer has the obligation to make all determinations as to whether a person qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. This includes the determination that the person possesses an appropriate degree of knowledge and experience, as well as ensuring that, the person embodies the highest standards of personal and professional integrity. The members of the Committee shall be elected by the Board at the annual organizational meeting of the Board or until their successors shall be duly elected and qualified. Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board, the members of the Committee shall designate a Chair by majority vote of the full Committee membership. III. MEETINGS
The Committee shall meet at least four times annually, and more frequently as circumstances dictate. As part of its job to foster open communications, the Committee should meet at least annually with management and the director of the internal auditing department and the independent accountants in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters the Committee or each of these groups believe should be discussed privately. In addition, the Committee, or at least its Chair, should meet with the independent accountants and management quarterly to review the Corporation’s financial statements consistent with Section IV. Item 4 below. IV. | RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES |
To fulfill its responsibilities and duties the Audit Committee shall: Documents/Reports Review 1. | Review and update this Charter, at least annually, as conditions dictate. |
2. | Review the organization’s annual financial statements and any reports of other financial information submitted to any governmental body or the public, including any certification, report, opinion, or review rendered by the independent accountants. |
3. | Review the regular internal audit reports to management prepared by the internal auditing department and management’s responses to ensure appropriate corrective action. |
4. | Review with financial management and the independent accountants the 10-Q prior to its filing or prior to the release of earnings. The Chair of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this review. |
5. | Review and approve the annual audit plan for the parent company and the significant audit findings tracking sheet. |
6. | Ensure external and internal auditors have unrestricted access to information; records and personnel to perform audit function. |
Exhibit B Page 2 of 5
7. | The Loan Review function at Premier and its affiliates will be supervised by the Internal Audit Manager of Premier. The Internal Audit Manager is responsible for staffing of this function, the cross training of the staff for loan review, and to immediately inform the Premier Audit Committee should the Loan Review function require additional support to complete its mission timely. |
8. | The Audit Committee shall have the authority to conduct independent investigations as needed using external or internal resources. |
Exhibit B Page 2 of 6
Independent Accountants9. | The Audit Committee shall have sole discretion in approving all outsourced internal audits. The Chair of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for these purposes. |
9. | Independent Accountants |
10. | The Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the external auditors. The external auditors, in their capacity as independent public accountants, shall be responsible to the board of directors and directly to the Audit Committee as representatives of the shareholders. |
10.11. | On an annual basis, ensure receipt of a formal written statement from the external auditors consistent with standards set by the Independence Standards Board. Additionally, the Committee shall discuss with the auditor relationships or services that may affect auditor objectivity or independence. If the Committee is not satisfied with the auditor’s assurances of independence, it shall take or recommend to the full board appropriate action to ensure the independence of the external auditor. |
11.12. | At least annually, review the performance of the independent accountants and approve any proposed discharge of the independent accountants when circumstances warrant. |
12.13. | Periodically consult with the independent accountants in executive session about internal controls and the fullness and accuracy of the organization’s financial statements. |
13.14. | At least annually pre-approve all auditing services and non-auditing services provided by an external auditor (and shall disclose to investors in periodic reports required by Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 any approved non-audit services). |
Exhibit B Page 3 of 5
Financial Reporting ProcessesProcess
14.15. | In consultation with the independent accountants and the internal auditors, review the integrity of the organization’s financial reporting processes, both internal and external, and review any reports of the chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other officers disclosing (i) significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls. |
15.16. | Consider the independent accountants’ judgment about the quality and appropriateness of the Corporation’s accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. |
16.17. | Consider and approve, if appropriate, major changes to the Corporation’s auditing and accounting principles and practices as suggested by the independent accountants, management or the internal auditing department. |
17.18. | Establish regular and separate systems of reporting to the Audit Committee by each of management, the independent accountants and the internal auditors regarding any significant judgments made in management’s preparation of the financial statements and the view of each as to appropriateness of such judgments. |
Exhibit B Page 3 of 6
18.19. | Following completion of the annual audit, review separately with each of management, the independent accountants and the internal auditing department any significant difficulties encountered during the course of the audit, including any restrictions of the scope or work or access to required information. |
19.20. | Review any significant disagreement among management and the independent accountants or the internal auditing department in connection with the preparation of the financial statements. |
20.21. | Review with the independent accountants, the internal auditing department and management the extent to which changes or improvements to financial or accounting practices, as approved by the Audit Committee, have been implemented. (This review should be conducted at an appropriate time subsequent to implementation of changes or improvements, as decided by the Committee). |
Ethical and Legal Compliance 21.22. | Establish, review and update periodically a Code of Ethical conduct and ensure that management has established a system to enforce this code. |
Exhibit B Page 4 of 5
22.23. | Review management’s monitoring of the Corporation’s compliance with the organization’s Ethical Code, and ensures management has the proper review system in place to ensure Corporation’s financial statements, reports and other financial information disseminated to governmental organizations, and the public satisfy legal requirements. |
23.24. | Review activities, organizational structure, and qualifications of the internal audit department. |
24.25. | Review, with the organization’s counsel, legal compliance matters including corporate securities trading policies. |
25.26. | Review, with the organization’s counsel, any legal matter that could have a significant impact on the organization’s financial statements. |
26.27. | Establish procedures for: |
| (A) | the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and |
| (B) | the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
27.28. | Perform any other activities consistent with this Charter, the Corporation’s By-laws and governing law, as the Committee or the Board deem necessary or appropriate. |
V. EXTERNAL RESOURCES
The Committee shall be authorized to access internal and external resources, as the Committee requires, to carry out its responsibilities. The Committee may engage and shall have access to its own independent counsel and other advisors at the Committee’s sole discretion. The Corporation shall provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment of compensation of the external auditor and any independent counsel and other advisors engaged by the Committee. Exhibit B Page 4 of 6
EXHIBIT A to AUDIT CHARTER
INDEPENDENCEApproved PFBI Audit Committee
(14) | "Independent Director" means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. For purposes of this rule, "Family Member" means a person's spouse, parents, children and siblings, whether by blood, marriage or adoption, or anyone residing in such person's home. The following persons shall not be considered independent: |
| (A) | a director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company; |
| (B) | a director who accepted or who has a Family Member who accepted any compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than the following: |
| (i) | compensation for board or board committee service; |
| (ii) | compensation paid to a Family Member who is an employee (other than an Executive Officer) of the Company; or |
| (iii) | benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation. |
| (C) | a director who is a Family Member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company as an Executive Officer; |
| (D) | a director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a partner in, or a controlling Shareholder or an Executive Officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than the following: |
| (i) | payments arising solely from investments in the Company's securities; or |
| (ii) | payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs. |
| (E) | a director of the Company who is, or has a Family Member who is, employed as an Executive Officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the Executive Officers of the Company serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or |
Exhibit B Page 5 of 6
| (F) | a director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a current partner of the Company's outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the Company's outside auditor who worked on the Company's audit at any time during any of the past three years. |
EXPERIENCE
All audit committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement at the time they join the board. In addition, at least one audit committee member must have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in the individual’s financial sophistication, including being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities.April 17, 2013
Exhibit B Page 65 of 65
EXHIBIT C
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
The compensation committee of the board of directors shall consist of a minimum of three directors. Members of the committee shall be appointed by the board of directors upon the recommendation of the nominating committee and may be removed by the board of directors in its discretion. All members of the committee shall be independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq Manual and “non-employee directors” as defined by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The purpose of the committee shall be to assist the board in carrying out the board of directors' overall responsibility relating to executive compensation.
In furtherance of this purpose, the committee shall have the following authority and responsibilities:
1. | To assist the board in developing and evaluating potential candidates for executive positions and to oversee the development of executive succession plans. |
2. | To recommend to the board of directors for approval the chief executive officer's annual compensation, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation. The chief executive officer may not be present during the committee's deliberations or voting on his compensation. |
3. | To review and recommend to the board of directors for approval on an annual basis the evaluation process and compensation structure for the company's officers. The committee shall evaluate the performance of the company's senior executive officers and shall recommend to the board of directors the annual compensation, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation, for such senior executive officers. The committee shall also provide oversight of management's decisions concerning the performance and compensation of other company officers. |
4. | To review the company's incentive compensation and other stock-based plans and recommend changes in such plans to the board as needed. The committee shall have and shall exercise all the authority of the board of directors with respect to the administration of such plans. |
5. | To prepare and publish an annual executive compensation report in the company's proxy statement. |
The committee shall have the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as the committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion.
The committee shall have authority to retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as the committee may deem appropriate in its sole discretion. The committee shall have sole authority to approve related fees and retention terms.
The committee shall report its actions and any recommendations to the board after each committee meeting. The committee shall review at least annually the adequacy of this charter and recommend any proposed changes to the board for approval.
Approved PFBI Compensation Committee April 17, 2013
Exhibit C Page 1 of 1
REVOCABLE PROXY
PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. | YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Shareholders of record have three ways to vote: 1. By Telephone (using a Touch-Tone Phone); or 2. By Internet; or 3. By Mail. To Vote by Telephone: Call 1-888-296-0156 Toll-Free on a Touch-Tone Phone anytime prior to 3 a.m., June 19, 2013. To Vote by Internet: Go to http://www.rtcoproxy.com/pfbi prior to 3 a.m., June 19, 2013. | | Please note that the last vote received from a shareholder, whether by telephone, by Internet or by mail, will be the vote counted. | | Mark here if you plan to attend the meeting. | £ | | Mark here for address change. | £ | | | | | | | Annual Meeting Materials are available at: | Comments: | http://www.cfpproxy.com/4881 | | | | | | | FOLD HERE IF YOU ARE VOTING BY MAIL PLEASE DO NOT DETACH |
| T | PLEASE MARK VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE | With- For All For hold Except | | | | | | | | 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: To elect as directors the following eight (8) nominees: Nominees: | ¨¨¨ | | 2. 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS. To ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath, LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. | For Against Abstain | | (01) Toney K. Adkins (04) Keith F. Molihan (07) Robert W. Walker | (02) Harry M. Hatfiled (05) Marshall T. Reynolds (08) Thomas W. Wright | (03) Lloyd G. Jackson II (06) Neal W. Scaggs | | 3. 3. ADVISORY (Non-Binding) PROPOSAL ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. To consider and approve the Company's executive compensation in an advisory vote. | For Against Abstain | | INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee (s), mark “For All Except” and write that nominee(s’) name(s) or number(s) in the space provided below. | | 4. 4. ADVISORY (Non-Binding) PROPOSAL ON FREQUENCY OF SHAREHOLDER VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. To recommend, in an advisory vote, the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation. | One Two Three Year Year Year Abstain | | | | | | | 5. 5. OTHER BUSINESS. To transact such other matters as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. (The Board of Directors does not know of any such other matters). | | | | | | | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1, A VOTE “FOR” ITEM 2, A VOTE “FOR” ITEM 3, AND A VOTE “FOR” ONE YEAR IN ITEM 4. | | | | | | | Information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting is contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement accompanying this proxy. | | Please be sure to date and sign this proxy card in the box below. | Date | | | | | | | | Sign above Co-holder (if any) sign above | | | | | | | | Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on your stock certificate(s). When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. All joint owners must sign. | | | | | | |
PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. — ANNUAL MEETING, JUNE 19, 2013 YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! Annual Meeting Materials are available on-line at: http://www.cfpproxy.com/4881 You can vote in one of three ways: 1. | Call toll free 1-888-296-0156 on a Touch-Tone Phone. There is NO CHARGE to you for this call. |
or 2. | Via the Internet at http://www.rtcoproxy.com/pfbi and follow the instructions. |
or 3. | Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope. |
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS (Continued, and to be marked, dated and sgined, on the other side) REVOCABLE PROXY PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS June 16, 201019, 2013 10:30 a.m. local time THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, the undersigned shareholder of PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. (“Company”), Huntington, West Virginia, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint TONEY K. ADKINS and KEITH F. MOLIHAN or any of them (with full power to act alone), my true and lawful attorney(s) and proxy(ies) with full power of substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, to vote all of the Common Stock of the companyCompany standing in my name on its books at the close of business on April 28, 2010,May 1, 2013, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Pullman Plaza Hotel, 1001 3rd Avenue, Huntington, West Virginia, on June 16, 2010,19, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. (eastern daylight time), and at any adjournment thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present as follows: This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors and will be voted as specified and in accordance with the accompanying proxy statement. If no instruction is indicated, then the above named proxies, or any one of them, will vote the shares represented “FOR” all of the nominees listed in Item #1, “FOR” Item #2, “FOR” Item #3 and “FOR” One Year in Item 34 and in accordance with their discretion on any other business that may properly come before the meeting. PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
FOLD AND DETACH HERE PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. — ANNUAL MEETING, JUNE 16, 2010
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
You can vote in one of three ways:
1. | Call toll free 1-866-547-4634 on a Touch-Tone Phone. There is NO CHARGE to you for this call.
|
or
2. | Via the Internet at https://www.proxyvotenow.com/pfbi and follow the instructions.
|
or
3. | Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope. |
PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR VOTING INSTRUCTIONSENVELOPE.
T | PLEASE MARK VOTES | REVOCABLE PROXY | PROXY FOR 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
| AS IN THIS EXAMPLE | PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. | With- For All
For hold Except
| | 1.ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:
To elect as directors the following nine (9) nominees:
| £ £ £ | 2.RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS. To ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath, LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
| | (01) Toney K. Adkins
(04) E.V. Holder, Jr.
(07) Neal W. Scaggs
| (02) Hosmer A. Brown, III
(05) Keith F. Molihan
(08) Robert W. Walker
| (03) Edsel R. Burns (06) Marshall T. Reynolds
(09) Thomas W. Wright
| INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark “For All Except” and write that nominee’s name in the space provided below. | 3.ADVISORY (Non-Binding) PROPOSAL ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
To consider and approve an advisory (non-binding) proposal on executive compensation.
| For Against Abstain
| | | 4.OTHER BUSINESS.
To transact such other matters as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. (The Board of Directors does not know of any such other matters).
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1, A VOTE “FOR” ITEM 2, AND A VOTE “FOR” ITEM 3.
Information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting is contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement accompanying this proxy.
| | Please be sure to sign and date this
Proxy in the box below.
| Date | | | | If your address has changed please mark here and correct the address below.
| £
| Stockholder sign above Co-holder (if any) sign above
| | | Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on your stock certificate(s). When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. All joint owners must sign.
| | | | IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW | | | Ã If voting by mail please fold and detach above card, sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided. Ã
| PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.
HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA
|
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
Shareholders of record have three ways to vote:
1.By Mail; or
2.By Telephone (using a Touch-Tone Phone); or
3. By Internet.
A telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned this proxy. Please note telephone and Internet votes must be cast prior to 3 a.m., June 16, 2010. It is not necessary to return this proxy if you vote by telephone or Internet.
Vote by Telephone
Call Toll-Free on a Touch-Tone Phone
anytime prior to
3 a.m., June 16, 2010.
1-866-547-4634
| | Vote by Internet
anytime prior to
3 a.m., June 16, 2010 go to
https://www.proxyvotenow.com/pfbi
|
Please note that the last vote received, whether by telephone, Internet or by mail, will be the vote counted.
|